00:25:33	Mark’s iPhone (2):	I noticed that several GW events in O4 have multiple distance estimates. Some have two or three different numbers of Mpc, why is that?
00:29:15	Patrick R Brady:	https://wiki.gw-astronomy.org/OpenLVEM/Telecon20230921
00:35:29	Ryan Foley:	do you know the combined (both H+L) up time?
00:36:01	Ryan Foley:	thanks
00:37:10	Roberto De Pietri:	Two IFO is around ~58% 1FO is around ~86%
00:37:36	Ryan Foley:	thanks!
00:42:03	mandeep gill:	Reacted to "Two IFO is around ~5..." with 👍🏽
00:56:20	Patrick R Brady:	I see Gianluca’s hand …
00:57:02	Francesco Verrecchia:	exactly,  when? Next year?
01:12:45	Aaron Tohuvavohu:	https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_l/S230918aq.lvc
01:14:13	Thomas Dent:	is that assuming everyone is using ‘GCN classic’ though?
01:14:26	Eric Burns:	GCN classic socket connection should basically 0 s delay
01:14:41	Eric Burns:	I'm not sure we have checked GCN Kafka latency, so if you all have that number we would certainly be interested
01:15:12	Eric Burns:	GCN classic socket connection should basically 0 s delay
should basically be* 0 s delay
01:15:18	Adam Brazier:	SCiMMA Hopskotch has less than 1s of latency and is also running Kafka, so I assume GCN Kafka is similar
01:15:40	Eric Burns:	Reacted to "SCiMMA Hopskotch has..." with 👍
01:16:33	Shaon Ghosh:	Thanks for clarifying.
01:16:40	Adam Brazier:	there's some tuning available but Kafka is very performant
01:20:44	mandeep gill:	I would volunteer for that..
01:21:09	Francesco Verrecchia:	Reacted to "SCiMMA Hopskotch has..." with 👍
01:21:35	Adam Brazier:	I like the idea, but I am in SCiMMA's management team so my vote already cast
01:22:27	Peter Kramer:	Replying to "I'm not sure we have..."

I got the kafka notice 2 seconds earlier
01:22:35	Roberto De Pietri:	S230524x   #1 FAR=7.22e-08  pycbc-EarlyWarning SCIMMA back to Caltech [-6s]
01:23:54	Francesco Verrecchia:	thanks you
01:24:13	Shaon Ghosh:	Thanks patrick